
doi: 10.1109/swat.1970.4
A set of equivalences is established among cellular automata, iterative acceptors, and linear-bounded automata. However, cellular automata are shown to be inherently faster than iterative acceptors. Many positive results are presented to indicate that the context-free languages can, perhaps, be accepted in time n and space n by cellular automata.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 48 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
