
doi: 10.1109/seaa.2016.17
This paper presents the results of an empirical experiment conducted in an academic environment with the aim of comparing the specification of acceptance test cases with executable and nonexecutable test description formats in the domain of event processing application development. In the experiment subjects had to specify functional test cases for given requirements. We evaluated the effort, test coverage and perceived difficulty. Our results show a positive effect on using the executable test description with regard to the effort of test specification.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
