
doi: 10.1109/sccc.2012.34
Facing the dissatisfaction of the users of the public healthcare services, the Chilean government required a study to determine the main reasons the health services were extremely bad evaluated. This article describes the first part of this study, showing the process to achieve a diagnosis and conclude that the bad evaluation is a mixture of three key points: Uncertainty with having one of the morbidity appointments, inefficient management showed to the users, and long and uncertainty waiting time to get a referral to secondary/tertiary health services. Beyond the solution of implement an EMR, this article presents main directions for designing a solution that considers the key points we found.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
