
The number of states requiring a Private Investigator (PI) license to practice computer forensics is growing despite the wealth of evidence that demonstrates the requirements are inconsistent with the actual qualifications needed to be an effective digital forensics investigator. This paper explores the current trend, the early observed effects of this trend, the types of certifications available outside of the PI licensing requirements, and concludes with some alternatives that should be investigated in order to ensure that the ever-widening array of scenarios that involve digital evidence can be investigated thoroughly and properly by practicing professionals with the proper credentials to secure, investigate, analyze, and present the digital evidence.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
