
An image quality estimator (QE) can be used to improve the performance of a system, but only if its scores are easily interpretable. In this paper, we present software, entitled “Stress Testing Image Quality Estimators (STIQE)” that systematically explores the performance of a QE, with the goal of enabling users to interpret the QE's scores. Our software allows consistent and reproducible benchmarks of new QEs as they are developed, so the most effective QE for an application can be chosen. We demonstrate that results produced by the software provide new insights into hidden aspects of existing QEs.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
