
We examine the concept of Quality of Information (QoI); the idea that networked data systems can better support users if they have a notion of what the data is being used for. We argue that to judge quality it is as important to know how the data was processed as it is to know what the data says. We model QoI systems as a structure that enforces the annotation of data creating processes with the data they produce. Furthermore, we model the evaluation of quality as functions that map information into a closed and bounded, totally ordered set. We define addition and multiplication operations which make a subring out of the set, thus allowing data composed of multiple pieces of information to be evaluated as sums and products of its components. Finally, we give an example to show how our model supports the delivery of high quality information.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
