
doi: 10.1109/pact.2011.71
Current main memory system design is severely limited by the decades-old synchronous DRAM architecture, which requires the memory controller to track the internal status of memory devices (chips) and schedule the timing of all device operations. This rigidity has become an obstacle of integrating emerging memory technologies such as PCM into existing memory systems, because their timing requirements are vastly different. Furthermore, with the trend of embedding memory controllers into processors, it is crucial to have interoperability among general-purpose processors and diverse memory modules. To address this issue, we propose a new memory architecture framework called universal memory architecture (UniMA). It enables the interoperability by decoupling the scheduling of device operations from memory controller, using a bridge chip at each memory module to perform local scheduling. The new architecture may also help improve memory scalability, power efficiency, and bandwidth as previously proposed decoupled memory organizations. A major focus of this study is to evaluate the performance impact of local scheduling of device operations. We present a prototype implementation of UniMA on top of DDRx memory bus, and then evaluate its efficiency with different workloads. The simulation results show that UniMA actually improves memory system efficiency for memory-intensive workloads due to increased parallelism among memory modules. The overall performance improvement over the conventional DDRx memory architecture is 3.1% on average. The performance of other workloads is reduced slightly, by 1.0% on average, due to a small increase of memory idle latency. In short, the prototype and evaluation demonstrate that it is possible to integrate diverse memory technologies into a single memory architecture with virtually no loss of overall performance.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
