Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Quantitative Accuracy and Efficiency of the Dual Reconstruction Scheme Including a Practical Scatter/Random Approximation in Dynamic PET Imaging

Authors: Ju-Chieh Cheng; Arman Rahmim; Stephan Blinder; Katherine Dinelle; Vesna Sossi;

The Quantitative Accuracy and Efficiency of the Dual Reconstruction Scheme Including a Practical Scatter/Random Approximation in Dynamic PET Imaging

Abstract

We describe a time-efficient reconstruction scheme with a practical approximate scatter and random correction for dynamic PET imaging on scanners with large data sets such as the High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT). This dual (histogram/list-mode) reconstruction scheme makes use of the efficiency advantage of both histogram and list-mode reconstructions (i.e. histogram-mode reconstruction is applied to the dynamic frames with a large number of counts, and list-mode reconstruction is applied to the frames with a low number of counts). The practical scatter and random approximation technique is based on a time averaged scatter and random estimate followed by scaling according to the global numbers of true and random events for each temporal frame. The quantitative accuracy of this dual reconstruction scheme including the scatter and random approximation was examined by comparing the time activity curves (TAC) obtained from the images reconstructed using the conventional histogram-mode algorithm and those obtained from applying the dual reconstruction scheme with the practical approximation. A representative dynamic 11C non-human primate study with 14 temporal frames is presented here, and an excellent agreement between the conventional and the proposed scheme was found, while an overall gain of about 35% in time (which depends on the number of dynamic frames; the more frames with a similar spatial activity distribution there are, the more time we gain) and an over 4 times less storage cost for the scatter and random data sets (sinograms) was achieved in this case.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!