
Balabanian suggests that an "ideology of technology" has emerged, one that assumes a value-neutrality for technology while ignoring political power and economic interests, one that blames "man" when things go wrong. The author thinks Balabanian is correct to argue that there are many different "we's" in society who bear responsibility for technological choice and that as such we should distinguish levels of responsibility that may range from corporate production decisions to individual and collective consumer choices. Balabanian is also correct to suggest that technology is not neutral, that it is inherently value-laden. That is, there is inherent in the decision to design an artifact in a certain way a specific set of human needs, desires, and values. This is inescapable and has little to do with "proper/improper" use of the product or process, even though the latter may well happen, and more often than we might wish or recognize. Thus, technology is neither autonomous, nor is it neutral
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
