descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Sep 2019Publisher:Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)Journal:IEEE Security & Privacy, volume 17, pages 47-57 (issn: 1540-7993, eissn: 1558-4046,

Authors: Hannes Tschofenig; Emmanuel Baccelli;

doi: 10.1109/msec.2019.2923973

Cyberphysical Security for the Masses: A Survey of the Internet Protocol Suite for Internet of Things Security

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

As IoT deployments expand, IoT security lags infamously behind. This paper surveys IoT security protocols standardized by the IETF, maps protocols to regulatory IoT security guidelines (from ENISA), and discusses remaining gaps. We observe that, while IETF protocols alone do not completely secure IoT devices, they go a long way.

Related Organizations

Keywords

Index Terms-IoT, Low-Power, Standards, IoT, Microcontroller, IETF, [INFO.INFO-NI] Computer Science [cs]/Networking and Internet Architecture [cs.NI], Security, Network, Protocols

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	25
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%