
doi: 10.1109/mse.2007.84
In the fast paced world of IC design, companies strive for ways to create competitive, robust designs, while delivering speedy time-to-market results. A top-down design flow provides a fast, results oriented design methodology, but, at most Universities, the strong legacy of the Mead/Conway approach has lead to custom methods being the default way to teach students VLSI design. This paper discusses some experiences with teaching a top-down System-on-a- Chip (SoC) design class.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
