<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Improving software process improvement

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jul 2002 English Publisher:Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)Journal:IEEE Software, volume 19, pages 92-99 (issn: 0740-7459,

Authors: Alfonso Fuggetta; H. Conradi;

doi: 10.1109/ms.2002.1020295

Improving software process improvement

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

Two dichotomies characterize software process improvement efforts and approaches: disciplined versus creative work and procurer risks versus user satisfaction. Based on these perspectives, the authors introduce six theses to illuminate the problems of pursuing SPI.

Related Organizations

Polytechnic University of Milan
Italy

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	105
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 1%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%

Found an issue? Give us feedback

105

Top 10%

Top 1%

Top 10%

Upload OA version

Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?

uploadUpload now!