
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Modeling information relevance aims to construct a conceptual understanding of information significant for users’ goals. Today, myriad relevance estimation methods are extensively used in various systems and services, mostly using behavioral signals such as dwell-time and click-through data and computational models of visual or textual correspondence to these behavioral signals. Consequently, these signals have become integral for personalizing social media, search engine results, and even supporting critical decision making. However, behavioral signals can only be used to produce rough estimations of the actual underlying affective states that users experience. Here, we provide an overview of recent alternative approaches for measuring and modeling more nuanced relevance based on physiological and neurophysiological sensing. Physiological and neurophysiological signals can directly measure users’ affective responses to information and provide rich data that are not accessible via behavioral measurements. With these data, it is possible to account for users’ affective experience and attentional correlates toward information. Modeling information relevance aims to construct a conceptual understanding of information significant for users' goals. Today, myriad relevance estimation methods are extensively used in various systems and services, mostly using behavioral signals such as dwell-time and click-through data and computational models of visual or textual correspondence to these behavioral signals. Consequently, these signals have become integral for personalizing social media, search engine results, and even supporting critical decision making. However, behavioral signals can only be used to produce rough estimations of the actual underlying affective states that users experience. Here, we provide an overview of recent alternative approaches for measuring and modeling more nuanced relevance based on physiological and neurophysiological sensing. Physiological and neurophysiological signals can directly measure users' affective responses to information and provide rich data that are not accessible via behavioral measurements. With these data, it is possible to account for users' affective experience and attentional correlates toward information.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
