
doi: 10.1109/mis.2011.85
This article harks back to the origins of this periodical as IEEE Expert Systems. Even while expert systems as a field or paradigm was morphing into intelligent systems, it was recognized that cognitive task analysis was critical in the design of new technologies. Furthermore, as a part of cognitive task analysis, it is crucial to conduct some form of proficiency scale to help identify the experts whose knowledge and skill might be revealed and specified in the creation of reasoning and knowledge-based systems. In this article, we will advance the claim that identifying and studying franchise experts can contribute to the design of intelligent systems. Of further interest is the possibility that the knowledge elicited from such experts might be invaluable for the practice of accelerated learning. We refer to "franchise" experts because they are not only expert in their chosen technical domain but also expert with regard to the organizations to which they belong. As a concept map organizer within a "knowledge model," some of the nodes are appended with icons that link to other concept maps that drill down into details, technical documentation, schematics, URLs, and so forth. This concept map shows that the franchise expert's knowledge refers to organizational structures and topics.
intelligent systems, Learning systems, franchise experts, knowledge-based organizations, mentoring, Electrical &, accelerated learning, based systems, Expert systems, Knowledge, Engineering, human-computer interaction, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science, Electronic, Human computer interaction
intelligent systems, Learning systems, franchise experts, knowledge-based organizations, mentoring, Electrical &, accelerated learning, based systems, Expert systems, Knowledge, Engineering, human-computer interaction, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science, Electronic, Human computer interaction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
