Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Drawing the line between a multi-platform architecture and a detailed implementation design: Where does the Government Reference Architecture (GRA) end and Platform Specifc Design begin?

Authors: Dave Riling;

Drawing the line between a multi-platform architecture and a detailed implementation design: Where does the Government Reference Architecture (GRA) end and Platform Specifc Design begin?

Abstract

The 2005 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) challenged Government and Industry to improve synchronization between satellite terminal programs and to reduce the time required to field new terminals. In response, the U. S. Army began a consortium with industry to develop a course of actions and implement a realizable cost effective approach that directly addresses this challenge. The result of this consortium effort was the development of a Government Reference Architecture (GRA) for the above 2 GHz SATCOM terminal domain. This architecture was designed as a cross service solution addressing a diverse set of possible platforms from submarine to ground mobile assets. As such the architecture was required to provide the necessary foundation for terminal development which both constrains the solution set promoting reuse, COTS utilization, and true modularity while providing the designer/integrator with the flexibility to incorporate new technologies and address unique requirements associated with a particular platform or service. Obviously defining the line that separates architecture from implementation design detail is difficult. This paper will outline how the consortium defined this line, and discuss some of the implementation issues various industry groups are facing in developing GRA based implementations today.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!