Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Performance comparison between FH-FDMA and FHMA systems under the worst case band multitone jamming

Authors: null Yeomin Yoon; null Seokjoo Shin; null Sungdon Moon; null Kiseon Kim;

Performance comparison between FH-FDMA and FHMA systems under the worst case band multitone jamming

Abstract

The bit error rate (BER) performance of a fast frequency-hopped (FH) frequency division multiple access (FDMA) system is evaluated under the environment with band multitone jamming (MTJ), with the clipper receiver and the normalized envelope detection (NED) receiver as combining alternatives. As the number of groups increases at the cost of system complexity, eventually becoming a FHMA system, the worst case performance of FH-FDMA with the clipper receiver is gradually improved, while that of the NED receiver is hardly improved when SJR is less than 10 dB. Although the clipper receiver has a practical disadvantage because the clipping level depends on measurements of the signal output energy, the FHMA system with the clipper receiver can be an effective solution among the FH-FDMA systems in the presence of worst case band MTJ if a clipping level can be feasibly set.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!