
Programmers naturally expect that compilers and other code generation tools produce executable code that behaves as prescribed by source programs. However, compilers are complex programs that perform many subtle transformations. Bugs in compilers do happen and can lead to silently producing incorrect executable code from a correct source program. This is a significant concern in the context of high-assurance software that has been verified (at the source level) using formal methods (static analysis, model checking, program proof, etc): any bug in the compiler can potentially invalidate the guarantees so painfully established by the use of formal methods.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
