Remarks on "Comments on the limitations of the Thevenin and Norton equivalent circuits for a receiving antenna"

R.E. Collin

Found an issue? Give us feedback

IEEE Antennas and Pr...arrow_drop_down

IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine

Article . 2003 . Peer-reviewed

Data sources: Crossref

https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/map...

Article

Data sources: Microsoft Academic Graph

Remarks on "Comments on the limitations of the Thevenin and Norton equivalent circuits for a receiving antenna"

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Aug 2003 English Publisher:Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)Journal:IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, volume 45, pages 99-100 (issn: 1045-9243,

Copyright policy )

Authors: R.E. Collin;

doi: 10.1109/map.2003.1241318

Remarks on "Comments on the limitations of the Thevenin and Norton equivalent circuits for a receiving antenna"

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

Collin (see IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, no.45, p.119-124, 2003) remarks that Love (see IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol.45, no.4, p.98-99, 2003) has misinterpreted his. In the paper under discussion, he did not discuss the efficiency of a receiving antenna or give any comment on the maximum efficiency a parabolic receiving antenna could have. Love's statement that it appears that Collin believes most receiving antennas cannot have an efficiency greater than 50% is speculation on his part.

Related Organizations

Case Western Reserve University
United States

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	14
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average