
This paper describes and compares several kinds of pulse search methods for multipulse excited speech coder realization. These pulse search methods are derived from minimization criterion for errorpower between original speech and synthetic speech, but their performances and required computation amounts are different. Objective and subjective evaluations are carried out to compare the performances. Further, the relation between speech quality and pulse search method complexity is described. Based on these results, pulse search methods suitable for realizing a high-quality multipulse coder using current VLSI technology are discussed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
