
Visualization of proportions is a very common need and there are many techniques for it. The pie chart is popular among practitioners and general audience, but many prominent experts advise against using it. This paper reports an experiment where the pie chart is compared to stacked bar charts with a baseline condition of table. The aim is to study if the performance differences justify the bad reputation of pie charts. In the experiment the participants were requested to list out the elements of a visualization in descending order of size. The task time and the answer were recorded. The results show that the pie chart is slower and less accurate than the stacked bar chart, especially when the difference between the elements is small, but the participants find it slightly more pleasant to use. The participants also perceive the stacked bar chart as the most effective visualization.
pie charts, visualization of proportions, Tietojenkäsittely ja informaatiotieteet - Computer and information sciences, stacked bar charts
pie charts, visualization of proportions, Tietojenkäsittely ja informaatiotieteet - Computer and information sciences, stacked bar charts
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
