<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
We consider lattice coding over a Gaussian wiretap channel, where an eavesdropper listens to the transmissions between a transmitter and a legitimate receiver. In [1], a new lattice invariant called the secrecy gain was introduced as a code design criterion for wiretap lattice codes, shown to characterize the confusion that a chosen lattice code can cause at the eavesdropper: the higher the secrecy gain of the lattice, the more confusion. In this paper, a formula for the secrecy gain of unimodular lattices is derived. Secrecy gains of extremal odd unimodular lattices as well as unimodular lattices in dimension 16 are computed and compared. Finally, best wiretap lattice codes coming from unimodular lattices in dimension n, 8 ≤ n ≤ 16 are classified.
:Science::Mathematics::Discrete mathematics::Cryptography [DRNTU]
:Science::Mathematics::Discrete mathematics::Cryptography [DRNTU]
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |