Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Performance Comparison between Distributed Beamforming and Clustered Beamforming

Authors: Sahar Amini; Dong-jun Na; Kwonhue Choi;

Performance Comparison between Distributed Beamforming and Clustered Beamforming

Abstract

The performance of transmit beamforming (BF) systems in terms of the spatial correlation coefficient and channel gain variance (CGV) are analyzed over Rayleigh fading channels. We derive bit error rate (BER) of distributed BF (DBF) systems as a function of CGV of distributed channel links. As for clustered BF (CBF), we express its BER as the explicit function of the correlation coefficient. Based on the BER formulas, the required transmit signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for target BERs are derived in DBF and CBF as another performance measure. Using these expressions, the performance of DBF is compared with the spatially correlated CBF systems on CGV and correlation coefficient plane. Analytical results enable us to verify the fact that if one of the distributed antennas has significantly larger CGV than the others, it is better to employ CBF rather than DBF and vice versa. As the correlation among the CBF antennas increases, the area where DBF performs better increases. Via extensive performance evaluations for various cases, we quantitatively analyze the sensitivity of the performance gap between CBF and DBF according to the CGV ratio of DBF and the spatial correlation of CBF. The overall performance trends of CBF and DBF are almost the same irrespective performance measures, i.e., BER or required transmit SNRs. It is remarkable that the BER gap is almost invariant to SNRs and the required SNR gap is almost invariant to the target BER. We perform Monte Carlo simulations to verify the analytical results.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!