
doi: 10.1109/itng.2011.82
The choice of one or other usability principles to carryout a heuristic evaluation is one of the most difficult tasks in the planning of a heuristic evaluation. We have considered that the heuristics used until now, basicallyNielsen's, do not cover all usability features for any interactive systems and we show two real experiences to justify it. In a previous work, we reviewed usability heuristics definitions that appeared from 1986 to now and we found a lot of repeated principles that we summarized in 16 usability categories. In this work, we present a validation of them. The validation consists on a comparison between two sets of heuristics (these 16categories and our old set of categories based on the well-known Nielsen' set of heuristics) and differences relating to the amount of problems that each set has found in the same interactive system.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
