
doi: 10.1109/ism.2012.33
VP8 has recently been offered by Google as an open video compression format in attempt to compete with the widely used H.264 video compression standard. This paper describes the major differences between VP8 and H.264 and provides detailed comparative evaluations through extensive experiments. We use 29 raw video sequences, offering a wide spectrum of resolutions and content characteristics, with the resolution ranging from 176x144 (QCIF) to 3840x2160 (2160p). To ensure a fair study, we use 3 coding presets in H.264, each with three types of tuning, and 7 presets in VP8. The presets cover a variety of achieved quality or complexity levels. The performance metrics include accuracy of bit rate handling, encoding speed, decoding speed, and perceptual video quality.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
