
In this paper we investigate the effect of spatial coupling applied to the recently-proposed coded slotted ALOHA (CSA) random access protocol. Thanks to the bridge between the graphical model describing the iterative interference cancelation process of CSA over the random access frame and the erasure recovery process of low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes over the binary erasure channel (BEC), we propose an access protocol which is inspired by the convolutional LDPC code construction. The proposed protocol exploits the terminations of its graphical model to achieve the spatial coupling effect, attaining performance close to the theoretical limits of CSA. As for the convolutional LDPC code case, large iterative decoding thresholds are obtained by simply increasing the density of the graph. We show that the threshold saturation effect takes place by defining a suitable counterpart of the maximum-a-posteriori decoding threshold of spatially-coupled LDPC code ensembles. In the asymptotic setting, the proposed scheme allows sustaining a traffic close to 1 [packets/slot].
To be presented at IEEE ISIT 2012, Boston
slotted aloha, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Random Access, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), coded slotted aloha, Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering, random access, Interference Cancelation, ALOHA, Random access; Collision channel without feedback; Codes on graphs; ITERATIVE DECODING; spatial coupling, Spatial Coupling, CRDSA, spatial coupling
slotted aloha, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Random Access, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), coded slotted aloha, Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering, random access, Interference Cancelation, ALOHA, Random access; Collision channel without feedback; Codes on graphs; ITERATIVE DECODING; spatial coupling, Spatial Coupling, CRDSA, spatial coupling
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
