
We consider the problem of recovering a target matrix that is a superposition of low-rank and sparse components, from a small set of linear measurements. This problem arises in compressed sensing of structured high-dimensional signals such as videos and hyperspectral images, as well as in the analysis of transformation invariant low-rank recovery. We analyze the performance of the natural convex heuristic for solving this problem, under the assumption that measurements are chosen uniformly at random. We prove that this heuristic exactly recovers low-rank and sparse terms, provided the number of observations exceeds the number of intrinsic degrees of freedom of the component signals by a polylogarithmic factor. Our analysis introduces several ideas that may be of independent interest for the more general problem of compressed sensing and decomposing superpositions of multiple structured signals.
30 pages, 1 figure, preliminary version submitted to ISIT'12
Signal theory (characterization, reconstruction, filtering, etc.), sparse recovery, FOS: Computer and information sciences, convex optimization, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), low-rank recovery, Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis, compressed sensing
Signal theory (characterization, reconstruction, filtering, etc.), sparse recovery, FOS: Computer and information sciences, convex optimization, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), low-rank recovery, Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis, compressed sensing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 123 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
