
In this paper, we investigate the nature of the coding mechanisms required to ensure strong secrecy over wiretap channels. Specifically, we analyze the limitations of capacity-based wiretap codes, i.e. wiretap codes that associate to each confidential message a subcode whose rate approaches the eavesdropper's channel capacity. For a wiretap channel with a noiseless main channel and a binary symmetric eavesdropper's channel, we show that secrecy-capacity achieving sequences of capacity-based wiretap codes cannot achieve the strong secrecy capacity. We also show that sequences of random capacity-based wiretap codes achieve strong secrecy rates provided the eavesdropper's channel is degraded with respect to the channel for which the codes were designed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
