
Network attacks are becoming ever more sophisticated and are able to hide more easily in the increasing amount of traffic being generated by everyday activity. Administrators are placed in the unfortunate position of distinguishing between the two. The attack graph has been in use for some time because it provides a concise knowledge representation, and has had successful security metrics developed from it. Previous methods of attack plan recognition have relied on statistical inference to capture network attacks, however they are computationally expensive and can fail to capture obvious cause and effect relationships. In this paper, we use automated planning to capture new properties of attack graphs and use it for plan recognition. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of our approach.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
