Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

PLC Keynote

Authors: Michael Gschwind;

PLC Keynote

Abstract

Heterogeneous designs are becoming ubiquitous across many new systemarchitectures as architects are turning to accelerators to deliver increased system performance and capability. In order to realize the potential of these heterogeneous designs, a framework is needed to support applications to take advantage of system capabilities. A suitable framework will depend on a combination of hardware primitives and software programming models. Together, hardware and software for heterogeneous multicore designs have to address the four "P"s of modern system design: Productivity, Portability, Performance, and Partitioning. To support current software deployment models, hardware primitives and programming models must ensure application isolation for partitioned virtual machine environments and application portability across a broad range of heterogeneous system design offerings. Hardware primitives and programming models must enable data center architects to build systems that continue scaling up performance and application developers to develop their applications with the necessary productivity. The Coherent Accelerator Processor Interface (CAPI) provides the basis for such a framework as integration point of accelerators into the POWER system architecture. CAPI accelerators can access application data directly using an integrated MMU. The CAPI MMU also provides partition isolation. Enabling accelerators to manage and pace their data access simplifies programming and prevents the CPUs from becoming serial bottlenecks. Finally, CAPI provides pointer identify, i.e., it enables the same address to be used in both CPU and accelerator to retrieve the same objects from memory. Pointer identity lays the foundation for high performance and high productivity accelerator programming models.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!