Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Backpressure in shared-memory-based ATM switches under multiplexed bursty sources

Authors: Fabio M. Chiussi; Ye Xia 0001; Vijay P. Kumar;

Backpressure in shared-memory-based ATM switches under multiplexed bursty sources

Abstract

We study a shared-memory center-stage switch with input multiplexers and output demultiplexers, where backpressure is applied from the demultiplexers to the center stage, and from the center stage to the multiplexers. We consider three backpressure schemes: (i) non-selective backpressure (NSB), where a congested center stage or a congested demultiplexer applies backpressure indiscriminately to all the traffic destined to it, regardless of the destination; (ii) per-port selective backpressure (PPSB), where the center stage applies backpressure selectively only to the traffic destined to the center-stage port(s) experiencing congestion, but a demultiplexer applies backpressure indiscriminately to all the traffic destined to it; and (iii) per-subport selective backpressure (PSSB), where both center-stage switch and demultiplexers apply backpressure selectively only to the traffic destined to the output link(s) experiencing congestion. We show that NSB introduces heavy HOL blocking which limits the throughput of the system and causes heavy losses. On the contrary, PPSB and PSSB achieve high throughputs, and allow one to increase buffer utilization in the system while keeping the majority of the buffers physically separate in the input multiplexers. Both these schemes perform very well in the case where only limited sharing of the buffers in the center stage is allowed, as required to guarantee fairness in the switch. With PSSB, small buffer sizes in the demultiplexers can be used. If the buffers in the demultiplexers are large, PPSB and PSSB offer comparable performance.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!