
Publishing data as Linked Data increases the interoperability and discoverability of resources over the web space. This process involves several design decisions and technologies. However, there is no one-size-fits-all formula for publishing data as Linked Data. Also, the quality of linked data published is a key issue to take into account. In the library domain, the quality of linked data is a crucial point for improving the retrieval and use of the data. In this paper, we propose a set of methodological guidelines based on five activities for publishing library data as Linked Data. The proposed guidelines consider the quality of published data as a key issue. In this line, our approach includes a preprocessing task for data cleansing and normalization. The proposed approach has been applied in a use case for publishing bibliographic data from Open Access journals in Cuba. The results obtained show the applicability of the methodological guidelines proposed in a real environment.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
