
Broder's shingling is one of the state-of-the-art approaches in detecting near-duplicate documents. Prior evaluations of this method have shown that document-pairs which have different main content but have a large amount of similar unimportant details are the main sources of its errors. Different web pages from the same site are a good example of such documents. In such pages, almost always there is a similar boilerplate text which has a chance to be selected as the document's fingerprint and trick the algorithm. It seems that this problem is due to representing each document only by a sample of its shingles. This sample only contains some of the page's shingles and discards any other information. by Including additional information such as frequencies of shingles in this sample, we can improve the performance of the algorithm. This paper proposes a weighting of shingles and adapts shingling to be applied on weighted shingles. Our results have shown an improvement in shingling's performance.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
