
pmid: 17959463
Ambulatory respiratory data was gathered using inductive lethysmography technology with synchronous ECG(LifeShirte , VivoMetrics, Ventura, CA) during a study to evaluate the effect of an anxiolytic on heart rate variability and respiratory pattern as indicators of anxiety state. Positive control (PCR; post-marketing, broadly prescribed anxiolytic)and placebo (PBO) data was included in the analysis. Tidal volume waveforms were the result of a weighted sum of the abdominal and rib cage IP bands according to the qualitative diagnostic calibration method. A breath detection algorithm was run to identify the beginning and end of inhalation in these waveforms. Several types of respiratory artifact are common with ambulatory, non-controlled recordings and a consistent and reliable means is necessary to identify and manage such artifacts. An automated approach was adopted to define a reliable breathing index for each breath that labels that breath as contaminated by artifact or not. The root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) were computed on the tidal inspiratory volumes and total breath times for each epoch, both for all breaths and for only those breaths that were labeled as reliable. The results indicate that when a priori automated artifact detection is included, there is a significant linear decrease in both the volume and time indices for the PCR, whilst no significant differences were noted in the PBO group. Analyzing the data without prior marking of reliable breaths showed no significant results for either group. This study demonstrates the validity of ambulatory respiratory measurements as a means to assess anxiety and establishes the need to first identify reliable breathing periods prior to the analysis of ambulatory respiratory data.
Electrocardiography, Heart Rate, Respiration, Tidal Volume, Humans, Anxiety, Algorithms
Electrocardiography, Heart Rate, Respiration, Tidal Volume, Humans, Anxiety, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
