
pmid: 17281935
This paper describes an approach to be used for medical image segmentation evaluation. The process for segmenting organs and structures from medical images is gaining increased importance in the diagnosis of diseases and in guiding minimally invasive surgical and therapeutic procedures. While investigators are continuing to develop novel new segmentation approaches, little attention has been given to the development of a uniform and common framework for and performance metrics to be used in comparing different algorithms, in optimizing algorithms and in evaluating their performance. Choosing an appropriate effectiveness measure of object segmentation is a difficult task and weighting the importance of different possible performance metrics requires matching the metrics to the segmentation objectives. However, in all tasks, it is now believed that three types of metrics must be measured and reported: accuracy, precision and efficiency. In this paper, we review some of these metrics.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 94 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
