Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Synchronized shocks reduce defibrillation threshold

Authors: J.L. Jones; W.A. Noe; J.C. Moulder; O.H. Tovar; W. Hsu; null Yayun Lin;

Synchronized shocks reduce defibrillation threshold

Abstract

The extension of refractoriness hypothesis predicts that defibrillation success can be improved by synchronizing shocks to action potentials from cells in low intensity regions. Threshold should be lower for shocks delivered "early" in these action potentials than for shocks delivered "late". To test this hypothesis, defibrillating shocks were synchronized to monophasic action potentials recorded from a low intensity region in isolated rabbit hearts (N=6). Probability-of-success curves were generated for "early" and "late" shocks. The authors found that I/sub 50/ for "early" shocks was 17% lower than I/sub 50/ for "late" shocks (p<0.05). This corresponds to a 31% decrease in E/sub 50/ The relative standard deviation of I/sub 50/ decreased from 32% for "late" shocks to 18% for "early" shocks. Standard deviations at all success percentiles were larger for "late" shocks. These results suggest that synchronizing shocks to action potentials from a low intensity region may reduce defibrillation threshold and inter-subject variability.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!