
doi: 10.1109/icws.2006.68
WSDL-S and OWL-S are semantic Web services languages that both aim at enriching WSDL with semantic annotation. In this paper, we analyze the similarities and differences between the two languages aiming at showing how OWL-S annotations could take advantage of WSDL-S annotations. In the process, we discover and analyze representational trade-offs between the two languages.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
