
In classic pattern recognition problems, classes are mutually exclusive by definition. However, in many applications, it is quite natural that some instances belong to multiple classes at the same time. In other words, these applications are multi-labeled, classes are overlapped by definition and each instance may be associated to multiple classes. In this paper, we present a comparative study on various multi-label approaches using both gene and scene data sets. We expect our research efforts provide useful insights on the relationships among various classifiers as well as various evaluation measures and shed lights on future research. Although there is no clear winner across various performance measures, SVM Binary and Multi-label ADTree perform better than the others on most counts. We then propose a meta-learning approach by combining SVM binary and ADTree. Our experiments demonstrate that the combined method can take the advantages of the single approaches.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
