
arXiv: 1511.06522
We propose a method for integration of features extracted using deep representations of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) each of which is learned using a different image dataset of objects and materials for material recognition. Given a set of representations of multiple pre-trained CNNs, we first compute activations of features using the representations on the images to select a set of samples which are best represented by the features. Then, we measure the uncertainty of the features by computing the entropy of class distributions for each sample set. Finally, we compute the contribution of each feature to representation of classes for feature selection and integration. We examine the proposed method on three benchmark datasets for material recognition. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance by integrating deep features. Additionally, we introduce a new material dataset called EFMD by extending Flickr Material Database (FMD). By the employment of the EFMD with transfer learning for updating the learned CNN models, we achieve 84.0%+/-1.8% accuracy on the FMD dataset which is close to human performance that is 84.9%.
6 pages
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Machine Learning (cs.LG)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Machine Learning (cs.LG)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
