
In this paper, we accomplish matching score level fusion of multi-biometrics. In order to solve the incomparability among different classifiers’ outputs, Adaptive Confidence Transform (ACT) is introduced to convert the raw outputs of different classifiers to the estimates of posteriori probabilities conforming to different users. These posteriori probabilities are then combined using several fusion methods. Experiments conducted on a database (including face, iris, online signature and offline signature traits) of about 100 users indicate that for the same fusion method, ACT based normalization generally results in better verification performance and is more robust compared to other normalization methods. Effects of different normalization and fusion methods on combination of "strong" and "weak" classifiers are also examined.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
