
Copy-paste processing is a frequently used method to tamper an image. For JPEG format is the mostly employed image format, more likely the copied slice came from JPEG image. In this paper, we first introduce two copy-paste tampering Scenarios: one is conducted between JPEG images and saved in a loss less format, the other is also conducted between JPEG images, but is saved in the JPEG format. Then we analyze and simulate the detection method for the two tampering Scenarios. We detect the tampered region by computing the sum of absolute difference images between the tampered image and a resaved JPEG compressed image at different quality factors. Experimental results show that our method can effectively detect the tampered region in two tampering Scenarios.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
