Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://www.rug.nl/r...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.1109/ichis....
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Conference object . 2023
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

GAP Test: A Cognitive Evaluation Procedure for Shape Descriptors

Authors: Anarta Ghosh; Nicolai Petkov;

GAP Test: A Cognitive Evaluation Procedure for Shape Descriptors

Abstract

With inspiration from psychophysical researches of the human visual system we propose a novel method for performance evaluation of contour based shape recognition algorithms. We use complete contour representations of objects as a training set. Incomplete contour representations of the same objects are used as a test set and the recognition performance of two shape based methods is investigated. The amount of incompleteness in test cases is quantified using the percentage of contour pixels retained. The performances of the methods are reported using the recognition rate as a function of the degree of incompleteness. We consider three types of incomplete contour representations, viz. segment-wise deletion, occlusion and random pixel depletion. The methods compared in this framework use shape context and distance multiset as local shape descriptors. Qualitatively, both methods mimic human visual perception in the sense that they perform best in the case of random depletion and worst in the case of occluded contours. Quantitatively, the distance multiset method performs better than the shape context method in this test framework.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average