
Doodle-based graphical passwords represent a challenging scenario due to their high variability and the tendency to be graphically simple. Despite this, doodle-based authentication using touch screens is a promising lightweight user verification method. Several works have been published in this field, although they report in general experimental verification results over small and private databases. In this paper we analyze the performance of several state-of-the-art systems for doodle verification, using the recently acquired DooDB database, which is publicly available. Several algorithms are tested, from the fields of gesture recognition and doodle and signature verification. A comparative study of their performance is done, and future research directions are pointed out.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
