
For several years the mantra has been “closing the Business – IT gap”, enabling business people to focus on strategic direction, while not being unnecessarily burdened by the complexity of the underlying support systems. The discipline of Business Architecture continues to evolve, attempting to bring rigor to the task of matching imprecise strategic needs to rigid IT systems. Increasingly literature acknowledges the need for precise connections between business needs and IT systems, however little usable guidance has been provided. This paper focuses narrowly but deeply at suggesting a precise way in which business applications and related elements of the business architecture can be modeled. It highlights the needs of business stakeholders and compares several existing models. The paper illustrates the inadequacy of these models in addressing our business questions, and proposes a model that offers some distinct advantages.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
