
Regulations and societal expectations have recently emphasized the need to mediate access to valuable databases. Fraud occurs when a person (mostly an insider) tampers illegally with a database. Data owners would like to be assured that such tampering has not occurred, or if it does, that it will be quickly discovered. The problem is exacerbated with data stored in cloud databases such as Amazon's Relational Database Service (RDS) or Microsoft's SQL Azure Database. In our previous work we have shown that information accountability across the enterprise is a viable alternative to information restriction for ensuring the correct storage, use, and maintenance of databases on extant DBMSes. We have developed a prototype audit system (DRAGOON) that employs cryptographic hashing techniques to support accountability in high-performance databases. Cloud databases present a new set of problems that make extending DRAGOON challenging. In this paper we discuss these problems and show how the DRAGOON architecture can be refined to provide a more practical and feasible information accountability solution for data stored in the cloud.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
