
doi: 10.1109/icde.2017.57
The problem of deriving lower and upper bounds for the edit distance between labelled undirected graphs has recently received increasing attention. However, only one algorithm has been proposed that allegedly computes not only an upper but also a lower bound for non-uniform metric edit costs and incorporates information about both node and edge labels. In this paper, we show that this algorithm is incorrect in the sense that, in general, it does not compute a lower bound. We present BRANCH, a corrected version of the algorithm that runs in O(n5) time. We also develop a speed-up BRANCHFAST that runs in O(n4) time and computes a lower bound, which is only slightly less accurate than the one computed by BRANCH. An experimental evaluation shows that BRANCH and BRANCHFAST yield excellent runtime/accuracy-tradeoffs, as they outperform all existing competitors in terms of runtime or in terms of accuracy.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
