
We tackle the difficult problem of summarizing the path/branching structure and value content of an XML database that comprises both numeric and textual values. We introduce a novel XML-summarization model, termed XCLUSTERs, that enables accurate selectivity estimates for the class of twig queries with numeric-range, substring, and textual IR predicates over the content of XML elements. In a nutshell, an XCLUSTER synopsis represents an effective clustering of XML elements based on both their structural and value-based characteristics. By leveraging techniques for summarizing XML-document structure as well as numeric and textual data distributions, our XCLUSTER model provides the first known unified framework for handling path/branching structure and different types of element values. We detail the XCLUSTER model, and develop a systematic framework for the construction of effective XCLUSTER summaries within a specified storage budget. Experimental results on synthetic and real-life data verify the effectiveness of our XCLUSTER synopses, clearly demonstrating their ability to accurately summarize XML databases with mixed-value content. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first work to address the summarization problem for structured XML content in its full generality.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
