
Multi-tenant data centers are complex environments, running thousands of applications that compete for the same infrastructure resources and whose behavior is guided by (sometimes) divergent configurations. Small workload changes or simple operator tasks may yield unpredictable results and lead to expensive failures and performance degradation. In this paper, we propose a holistic approach for detecting operational problems in data centers. Our framework, FlowDiff, collects information from all entities involved in the operation of a data center -- applications, operators, and infrastructure -- and continually builds behavioral models for the operation. By comparing current models with pre-computed, known-to-be-stable models, FlowDiff is able to detect many operational problems, ranging from host and network failures to unauthorized access. FlowDiff also identifies common system operations (e.g., VM migration, software upgrades) to validate the behavior changes against planned operator tasks. We show that using passive measurements on control traffic from programmable switches to a centralized controller is sufficient to build strong behavior models; FlowDiff does not require active measurements or expensive server instrumentation. Our experimental results using NEC data center testbed, Amazon EC2, and simulations demonstrate that FlowDiff is effective and robust in detecting anomalous behavior. FlowDiff scales well with the number of applications running in the data center and their traffic volume.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
