
doi: 10.1109/ic2e.2013.26
Map Reduce has been designed to accommodate large-scale data-intensive workloads running on large single-site homogeneous clusters. Researchers have begun to explore the extent to which the original Map Reduce assumptions can be relaxed including skewed workloads, iterative applications, and heterogeneous computing environments. Our work continues this exploration by applying Map Reduce across widely distributed data over distributed computation resources. This problem arises when datasets are generated at multiple sites as is common in many scientific domains and increasingly e-commerce applications. It also occurs when multi-site resources such as geographically separated data centers are applied to the same Map Reduce job. Using Hadoop, we show that the absence of network and node homogeneity and locality of data lead to poor performance. The problem is that interaction of Map Reduce phases becomes pronounced in the presence of heterogeneous network behavior. In this paper, we propose new cross-phase optimization techniques that enable independent Map Reduce phases to influence one another. We propose techniques that optimize the push and map phases to enable push-map overlap and to allow map behavior to feed back into push dynamics. Similarly, we propose techniques that optimize the map and reduce phases to enable shuffle cost to feed back and affect map scheduling decisions. We evaluate the benefits of our techniques in both Amazon EC2 and Planet Lab. The experimental results show the potential of these techniques as performance is improved from 7%-18% depending on the execution environment and application.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
