
doi: 10.1109/iat.2006.126
Over the last few years, argumentation has been gaining increasing importance in multi-agent systems research. LMA is a Logic of multiple-valued argumentation built on top of EALP (extended annotated logic programming). Araucaria is a software tool for analyzing and diagramming arguments written in natural language. We integrate these two systems involved in argumentation to an easy to use and more user-friendly argumentation system, in which natural arguments can be transformed into formal arguments, in order to lighten users' knowledge burden forced by formal argumentation frameworks, and attain extensive usability of formal argumentation systems. We illustrate the transformation process by translating natural arguments in English to formal arguments in EALP step-by-step, and then how the status of those formal arguments can be determined in LMA, resulting in the status determination of original natural arguments.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
