
A challenge for digital archives managing long lived data, such as medical records and land registers, is to guarantee long-term authenticity, integrity, and datedness. Although some techniques have been proposed that provide these security goals, most proposals lack a corresponding performance analysis. Thus, in this paper we provide an analytical analysis of the performance of several proposals. Following, to see the impact of different approaches on the runtime, we implemented the most promising schemes and compared them with respect to their required storage space and verification time. Furthermore, the identified computational bottlenecks of the techniques are presented and corresponding improvements are indicated. Finally, we show how to select a long-term archiving scheme and the appropriate key sizes based on trust assumptions and the number of documents to be archived.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
